Premium
Genome‐wide population structure and admixture analysis reveals weak differentiation among Ugandan goat breeds
Author(s) -
Onzima R. B.,
Upadhyay M. R.,
Mukiibi R.,
Kanis E.,
Groenen M. A. M.,
Crooijmans R. P. M. A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
animal genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.756
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1365-2052
pISSN - 0268-9146
DOI - 10.1111/age.12631
Subject(s) - biology , breed , genetic diversity , population , crossbreed , inbreeding , single nucleotide polymorphism , genetic distance , genetic admixture , genetic structure , boer goat , genetic variation , genetics , evolutionary biology , veterinary medicine , genotype , gene , demography , medicine , sociology
Summary Uganda has a large population of goats, predominantly from indigenous breeds reared in diverse production systems, whose existence is threatened by crossbreeding with exotic Boer goats. Knowledge about the genetic characteristics and relationships among these Ugandan goat breeds and the potential admixture with Boer goats is still limited. Using a medium‐density single nucleotide polymorphism ( SNP ) panel, we assessed the genetic diversity, population structure and admixture in six goat breeds in Uganda: Boer, Karamojong, Kigezi, Mubende, Small East African and Sebei. All the animals had genotypes for about 46 105 SNP s after quality control. We found high proportions of polymorphic SNP s ranging from 0.885 (Kigezi) to 0.928 (Sebei). The overall mean observed ( H O ) and expected ( H E ) heterozygosity across breeds was 0.355 ± 0.147 and 0.384 ± 0.143 respectively. Principal components, genetic distances and admixture analyses revealed weak population sub‐structuring among the breeds. Principal components separated Kigezi and weakly Small East African from other indigenous goats. Sebei and Karamojong were tightly entangled together, whereas Mubende occupied a more central position with high admixture from all other local breeds. The Boer breed showed a unique cluster from the Ugandan indigenous goat breeds. The results reflect common ancestry but also some level of geographical differentiation. admixture and f 4 statistics revealed gene flow from Boer and varying levels of genetic admixture among the breeds. Generally, moderate to high levels of genetic variability were observed. Our findings provide useful insights into maintaining genetic diversity and designing appropriate breeding programs to exploit within‐breed diversity and heterozygote advantage in crossbreeding schemes.