Premium
Evaluation of the root filling quality with experimental carrier‐based obturators: a CLSM and FEG‐SEM analysis
Author(s) -
Pirani Chiara,
Generali Luigi,
Iacono Francesco,
Cavani Francesco,
Prati Carlo
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
australian endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.703
H-Index - 34
eISSN - 1747-4477
pISSN - 1329-1947
DOI - 10.1111/aej.12577
Subject(s) - materials science , dentinal tubule , dentistry , confocal laser scanning microscope , rhodamine b , confocal laser scanning microscopy , penetration (warfare) , scanning electron microscope , composite material , chemistry , biomedical engineering , mathematics , medicine , catalysis , biochemistry , photocatalysis , operations research
This study evaluated tubule penetration of GuttaFlow Bioseal with cold single cone or carrier‐based technique, under confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Twenty straight single‐rooted teeth were instrumented with Hyflex CM and divided in two groups ( n = 10) according to the obturation method: single cold gutta‐percha cones; experimental carrier‐based obturators. GuttaFlow Bioseal, labelled with Rhodamine B dye, was used as sealer in both groups. Teeth transversally sectioned were observed under CLSM. Percentage of sealer penetration and integrity of sealer layer perimeter were measured. Surface and microstructural characteristics of obturators and gutta‐percha cones were compared by FEG‐SEM and EDX analysis. No significant differences were found between groups for each examined parameter. Significant differences ( P < 0.05) were reported mainly within groups. Integrity was similar among and within groups. FEG‐SEM/EDX analysis of obturators revealed the presence of Ba and Zn. Carrier‐based obturation technique associated with GuttaFlow Bioseal does not seem to affect sealer penetration into dentinal tubules.