Premium
The development of ecommists’ policy advice in New Zealand, 1930–34: with particular reference to Belshaw’s contribution
Author(s) -
Endres A.M.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
australian economic history review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.493
H-Index - 16
eISSN - 1467-8446
pISSN - 0004-8992
DOI - 10.1111/aehr.301004
Subject(s) - treasury , deflation , fell , economics , devaluation , balance (ability) , exchange rate , appeal , inflation (cosmology) , perspective (graphical) , macroeconomics , monetary policy , political science , law , geography , medicine , physics , cartography , artificial intelligence , theoretical physics , computer science , physical medicine and rehabilitation
Policy–makers initially followed early Canterbury School prescriptions that favoured immediate budget balance and the rapid deflation of internal prices and wages. The 1932 Economic Committee formed a consensus favouring a policy package which had originally been formulated by Copland and Belshaw, and which included, inter alia , the gradual achievement of budget balance and the adjustment of external prices through exchange rate devaluation. A conservative Treasury line propounded by Park and Murphy emphasized sole reliance on deflationary measures but fell out of favour after 1933. Fisher’s long–run perspective did not appeal to policy–makers concerned with an immediate economic crisis.