Premium
Local performance of six clonal alien species differs between native and invasive regions in G ermany and N ew Z ealand
Author(s) -
Beckmann Michael,
Bruelheide Helge,
Erfmeier Alexandra
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
austral ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.688
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1442-9993
pISSN - 1442-9985
DOI - 10.1111/aec.12087
Subject(s) - biology , invasive species , introduced species , prunella vulgaris , range (aeronautics) , native plant , population , ecology , achillea millefolium , biomass (ecology) , lotus , botany , medicine , materials science , alternative medicine , demography , pathology , traditional chinese medicine , sociology , composite material
Exotic plant invasions are widely observed to have strong biogeographic patterns with invasive species occurring at higher abundances in their introduced range when compared with their native range. However, only few field studies have validated this assumption by comparing plant populations of multiple species in their native and introduced ranges and have evaluated to what extent changes in sexual and clonal reproduction potentially have contributed to the success of plant invasions. Here, we present the results of a comparative field study in both the native ( G ermany) and the introduced ( N ew Z ealand, NZ ) ranges of six clonal plant species with different invasive status: A chillea millefolium L ., P ilosella officinarum V aill., H ypericum perforatum L ., P runella vulgaris L ., L eucanthemum vulgare L am. and Lotus pedunculatus C av. We hypothesized that all six species show better performance in introduced NZ than in native G erman populations and tested if population structures investigated at different scales provide a useful tool to identify differences between native and introduced occurrences. In 10 populations per species and country we assessed plant density and flowering proportion at the population scale and around individual plants, thereby identifying the ‘crowdedness’ of the populations. Furthermore, we collected individual plants and determined the number of attached clonal organs and plant biomass. For all six species crowdedness in NZ populations was higher than in G erman populations. Additionally, overall population density of four species and the production of clonal organs (expressed as total number or per biomass ratio) of three species were higher in NZ than in G ermany. When measured around individual plants, the flowering proportion was higher in native G erman populations of P ilosella officinarum, H ypericum perforatum and L eucanthemum vulgare . Although the study species differed in their invasive status, our findings show that for all six species performance was better in introduced than in native populations. Furthermore, this study emphasizes that multiple measures of plant performance, different spatial scales and differences among species should be taken into account when trying to identify biogeographic differences in the performance of weed species.