Premium
Life after opioid‐involved overdose: survivor narratives and their implications for ER/ED interventions
Author(s) -
Elliott Luther,
Bennett Alex S.,
WolfsonStofko Brett
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
addiction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.424
H-Index - 193
eISSN - 1360-0443
pISSN - 0965-2140
DOI - 10.1111/add.14608
Subject(s) - (+) naloxone , psychological intervention , emergency department , opioid overdose , medicine , suicide prevention , opioid use disorder , harm reduction , emergency medical services , poison control , stakeholder , opioid , psychiatry , medical emergency , nursing , public health , receptor , public relations , political science
Background and Aims Numerous states in the United States are working to stem opioid‐involved overdose (OD) by engaging OD survivors before discharge from emergency departments (EDs). This analysis examines interactions between survivors and medical care providers that may influence opioid risk behaviors post‐OD. Design Qualitative stakeholder analysis involving in‐depth interviews with samples from three groups. Setting Two hospitals in high OD‐mortality neighborhoods in New York City (NYC), USA. Participants Total N = 35: emergency medical services personnel (EMS; n = 9) and ED medical staff (EDS; n = 6) both working in high OD‐mortality neighborhoods in NYC; recent opioid‐involved OD survivors who had been administered naloxone and transported to a hospital ED ( n = 20). Measurements EMS and EDS interviews examined content of verbal interactions with survivors and attitudes related to people who use opioids. Survivor interviews addressed healthcare experiences, OD‐related behavioral impacts and barriers to risk‐reduction post‐OD. Findings Both EMS and EDS stakeholders described frequent efforts to influence survivors’ subsequent behavior, but some acknowledged a loss of empathy, and most described burnout related to perceived ingratitude or failure to influence patients. Survivors reported being motivated to reduce opioid risk following a non‐fatal OD and many described successful risk‐reduction efforts post‐OD. Intentions to cease opioid use or reduce risk were complicated by unmanaged, naloxone‐related withdrawal, lack of social support and perceived disrespect from EMS and/or EDS. Conclusions Emergency department interventions with opioid‐involved overdose (OD) survivors may benefit from training emergency medical staff to assure a continuity of non‐judgmental, socially supportive remediation attempts throughout contacts with different care‐givers. Brief interventions to educate emergency medical staff about current theories of addiction and evidence‐based treatment may achieve this goal while reducing care‐giver burnout and improving the uptake and efficacy of post‐OD interventions delivered in emergency departments.