Premium
Evaluating the impact of a national naloxone programme on ambulance attendance at overdose incidents: a controlled time–series analysis
Author(s) -
McAuley Andrew,
Bouttell Janet,
Barnsdale Lee,
Mackay Daniel,
Lewsey Jim,
Hunter Carole,
Robinson Mark
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
addiction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.424
H-Index - 193
eISSN - 1360-0443
pISSN - 0965-2140
DOI - 10.1111/add.13602
Subject(s) - opioid overdose , (+) naloxone , medicine , attendance , emergency medicine , emergency medical services , medical emergency , drug overdose , poison control , emergency department , opioid , psychiatry , receptor , economics , economic growth
Background and Aims It has been suggested that distributing naloxone to people who inject drugs (PWID) will lead to fewer attendances by emergency medical services at opioid‐related overdose incidents if peer administration of naloxone was perceived to have resuscitated the overdose victim successfully. This study evaluated the impact of a national naloxone programme (NNP) on ambulance attendance at opioid‐related overdose incidents throughout Scotland. Specifically, we aimed to answer the following research questions: is there evidence of an association between ambulance call‐outs to opioid‐related overdose incidents and the cumulative number of ‘take‐home naloxone’ (THN) kits in issue; and is there evidence of an association between ambulance call‐outs to opioid‐related overdose incidents in early adopter (pilot) or later adopting (non‐pilot) regions and the cumulative number of THN kits issued in those areas? Design Controlled time–series analysis. Setting Scotland, UK, 2008–15. Participants Pre‐NNP implementation period for the evaluation was defined as 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2011 and the post‐implementation period as 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2015. In total, 3721 ambulance attendances at opioid‐related overdose were recorded for the pre‐NNP implementation period across 158 weeks (mean 23.6 attendances per week) and 5258 attendances across 212 weeks in the post‐implementation period (mean 24.8 attendances per week). Intervention Scotland's NNP; formally implemented on 1 April 2011. Measurements Primary outcome measure was weekly incidence (counts) of call‐outs to opioid‐related overdoses at national and regional Health Board level. Data were acquired from the Scottish Ambulance Service (SAS). Models were adjusted for opioid replacement therapy using data acquired from the Information Services Division on monthly sums of all dispensed methadone and buprenorphine in the study period. Models were adjusted further for a control group: weekly incidence (counts) of call‐outs to heroin‐related overdose in the London Borough area acquired from the London Ambulance Service. Findings There was no significant association between SAS call‐outs to opioid‐related overdose incidents and THN kits in issue for Scotland as a whole (coefficient 0.009, 95% confidence intervals = −0.01, 0.03, P = 0.39). In addition, the magnitude of association between THN kits and SAS call‐outs did not differ significantly between pilot and non‐pilot regions (interaction test, P = 0.62). Conclusions The supply of take‐home naloxone kits through a National Naloxone Programme in Scotland was not associated clearly with a decrease in ambulance attendance at opioid‐related overdose incidents in the 4‐year period after it was implemented in April 2011.