Premium
Therapist and client discussions of drinking and coping: a sequential analysis of therapy dialogues in three evidence‐based alcohol use disorder treatments
Author(s) -
Magill Molly,
Walthers Justin,
Mastroleo Nadine R.,
Gaume Jacques,
Longabaugh Richard,
Apodaca Timothy R.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
addiction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.424
H-Index - 193
eISSN - 1360-0443
pISSN - 0965-2140
DOI - 10.1111/add.13313
Subject(s) - psychology , psychological intervention , clinical psychology , alcohol use disorder , coping (psychology) , motivational interviewing , psychotherapist , cognitive restructuring , odds , facilitation , cognition , psychiatry , medicine , logistic regression , alcohol , biochemistry , chemistry , neuroscience
Background and Aims Research into the active ingredients of behavioral interventions for alcohol use disorders (AUD) has focused upon treatment‐specific factors, often yielding disappointing results. The present study examines common factors of change in motivational enhancement therapy, cognitive–behavioral therapy and 12‐Step facilitation therapy by (1) estimating transitional probabilities between therapist behaviors and subsequent client Change (CT) and Sustain (ST) Talk and (2) examining therapist skillfulness as a potential predictor of transition probability magnitude. Design Secondary data analysis examined temporal associations in therapy dialogues. Setting United States : data were from Project MATCH (Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Homogeneity) (1997). Participants One hundred and twenty‐six participants who received motivational enhancement therapy, cognitive–behavioral therapy or 12‐Step facilitation therapy. Measurements Therapist behaviors were measured in three categories (exploring, teaching, connecting) and client statements included five categories (CT‐distal, ST‐distal, CT‐proximal, ST‐proximal, neutral). Therapist skillfulness was measured using a five‐point ordinal scale. Findings Relative to chance, therapist exploratory behaviors predicted subsequent client discussion of distal, drinking behavior [odds ratio (OR) = 1.37–1.78, P < 0.001] while suppressing discussion of proximal coping and neutral content (OR = 0.83–0.90, P < 0.01). Unexpectedly, therapist teaching suppressed distal drinking language (OR = 0.48–0.53, P < 0.001) and predicted neutral content (OR = 1.45, P < 0.001). Connecting behaviors increased both drinking and coping language, particularly language in favor of change (CT OR = 1.15–1.84, P < 0.001). Analyses of exploring and connecting skillfulness revealed that high skillfulness maximized these behaviors effect on client responses, but not teaching skillfulness. Conclusions In motivational enhancement therapy, cognitive–behavioral therapy, and 12‐Step facilitation therapy for alcohol use disorders, the therapists who explore and connect with clients appear to be more successful at eliciting discussion about change than therapists who engage in teaching behavior. Therapists who are more skilled achieve better results than those who are less skilled.