Premium
Inhibition of glycine transporter‐1 reduces cue‐induced nicotine‐seeking, but does not promote extinction of conditioned nicotine cue responding in the rat
Author(s) -
Cervo Luigi,
Di Clemente Angelo,
Orrù Alessandro,
Moro Federico,
Cassina Chiara,
Pich Emilio Merlo,
Corsi Mauro,
Gozzi Alessandro,
Bifone Angelo
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
addiction biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.445
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1369-1600
pISSN - 1355-6215
DOI - 10.1111/adb.12049
Subject(s) - nicotine , extinction (optical mineralogy) , pharmacology , stimulation , agonist , psychology , nmda receptor , self administration , glycine , chemistry , receptor , medicine , neuroscience , biochemistry , mineralogy , amino acid
Abstract Pharmacological stimulation of N ‐methyl‐ D ‐aspartate receptors ( NMDAr ) could enhance the outcome of cue‐exposure therapy for smoking cessation. NMDAr stimulation can be achieved by increasing pharmacologically the synaptic levels of glycine, a necessary co‐agonist. Here, we evaluate the effects of SSR 504734, a selective inhibitor of glycine type I transporter ( GlyT 1) in an extinction‐reinstatement procedure inducing robust and lasting nicotine‐seeking behavior in rats. Male W istar rats were trained to associate discriminative stimuli ( S D s ) with the availability of nicotine (0.03 mg/kg/65 μL /2 second/infusion) or sucrose (45‐mg pellet) versus non‐reward in two‐lever operant cages. Reinforced response was followed by cue signaling 20‐second time‐out ( CSs ). Once the training criterion was met, rats underwent extinction of lever presses, in the absence of reinforcers, S D s and CSs . Re‐exposure to nicotine or sucrose S D + / CS + , but not non‐reward S D − / CS − , revived responding at the previously reinforced lever. Acute pre‐treatment with SSR 504734 (10 mg/kg i.p.) reduced nicotine‐seeking but not sucrose‐seeking behavior without influencing rats' locomotor activity. Sub‐chronic treatment (10 mg/kg i.p. for 5 days) during daily exposure to S D + / CS + reduced nicotine‐seeking; however, this effect was transient, with return to S D + / CS + responding at 72 hours. Full recovery to S D + / CS + responding was observed after 1 month suggesting that SSR 504734 sub‐acute treatment did not engage the long‐term plasticity mechanisms probably involved in nicotine‐seeking. In conclusion, GlyT 1‐inhibitors might offer a therapeutic opportunity for acute cue‐controlled nicotine‐seeking, but the lack of persistent effects of the sub‐chronic treatment associated with nicotine cues exposure suggests that short‐term administration of GlyT 1‐inhibitor SSR 504734 is not sufficient to promote extinction of nicotine‐cue conditioned responding.