Premium
What makes a species a priority for nature conservation?
Author(s) -
Habel J. C.,
Gossner M. M.,
Schmitt T.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
animal conservation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.111
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1469-1795
pISSN - 1367-9430
DOI - 10.1111/acv.12512
Subject(s) - habitats directive , threatened species , generalist and specialist species , ecology , habitat , geography , prioritization , umbrella species , distribution (mathematics) , species distribution , vulnerability (computing) , endangered species , range (aeronautics) , biology , environmental resource management , environmental science , business , mathematical analysis , materials science , process management , mathematics , computer security , computer science , composite material
Abstract Prioritizing species for nature conservation should follow objective ecologically and biogeographically meaningful selection criteria. In this study, we test an approach to prioritize butterfly species for nature conservation considering the following parameters: (1) geographical distribution and endemicity, (2) vulnerability and (3) ecological specialization. Following these criteria, we identified 51 species of conservation priority out of the 403 European species assessed, that is 12.7%. This list of species and those included in the annexes II and IV of the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) had only four species in common. The species selected by both approaches differed significantly in their traits considering their distribution and ecological specialization with the annexes of the EU Habitats Directive including many species that are neither range‐restricted nor have their core distribution within Europe, and furthermore many not threatened ecological generalists. Our results suggest that species prioritization for nature conservation should follow objective criteria, such as distribution and ecological specialization.