z-logo
Premium
Amphibian and reptile communities and functional groups over a land‐use gradient in a coastal tropical forest landscape of high richness and endemicity
Author(s) -
Trimble M. J.,
Aarde R. J.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
animal conservation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.111
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1469-1795
pISSN - 1367-9430
DOI - 10.1111/acv.12111
Subject(s) - species richness , woodland , ecology , geography , habitat , old growth forest , abundance (ecology) , secondary forest , agroforestry , vegetation (pathology) , biodiversity , acacia , habitat fragmentation , biology , medicine , pathology
Abstract Information on the response of herpetofauna to different land uses is limited although important for land‐use planning to support conservation in human‐modified landscapes. Although transformation is dogmatically associated with extinction, species respond idiosyncratically to land‐use change, and persistence of species in habitat fragments may depend on careful management of the human‐modified matrix. We sampled herpetofauna over a vegetation‐type gradient representative of regional land uses [old‐growth forest, degraded forest, acacia woodland (i.e. new‐growth forest), eucalyptus plantation and sugar cane cultivation] in the forest belt skirting the southeastern coast of A frica, part of a biodiversity hotspot hosting many endemic herpetofaunal species in a highly transformed landscape. We categorized species into trait‐derived functional groups, and assessed abundance and richness of groups and compared community metrics along the gradient. We further assessed the capacity of environmental variables to predict richness and abundance. Overall, old‐growth forest harbored the highest richness and abundance, and amphibians and reptiles responded similarly to the gradient. Richness was low in cultivation, and surprisingly, in degraded forest, but substantial in acacia woodland and plantation. Composition differed between natural vegetation types (forest, degraded forest) and anthropogenic types (plantation, cultivation), while acacia woodland grouped with the latter for amphibians and the former for reptiles. Functional group richness eroded along the gradient, a pattern driven by the sensitivity of fossorial/ground‐dependent amphibians ( A 2) and reptiles ( R 2) and vegetation‐dwelling amphibians ( A 4) to habitat change. Variables describing temperature, cover and soil were good predictors of amphibian abundance, particularly of functional groups, but not for reptiles. Conserving forest and preventing degradation is important for forest herpetofaunal conservation, restoration and plantations have intermediate value, and cultivation is least beneficial. Our study demonstrates the utility of function‐related assessments, beyond traditional metrics alone, for understanding community responses to transformation. Particularly, fossorial/ground‐dependent amphibians and reptiles, and vegetation‐dwelling amphibians should be closely monitored.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here