Premium
Manic switches induced by antidepressants: an umbrella review comparing randomized controlled trials and observational studies
Author(s) -
Allain N.,
Leven C.,
Falissard B.,
Allain J.S.,
Batail J.M.,
Polard E.,
Montastruc F.,
Drapier D.,
Naudet F.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
acta psychiatrica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.849
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1600-0447
pISSN - 0001-690X
DOI - 10.1111/acps.12672
Subject(s) - observational study , randomized controlled trial , bipolar disorder , medicine , antidepressant , psychiatry , pediatrics , mood , anxiety
Objective We aimed to explore whether the prevalence of manic switch was underestimated in randomized controlled trials ( RCT s) compared to observational studies ( OS s). Method Meta‐analyses and simple and systematic reviews were identified by two reviewers in a blinded, standardized manner. All relevant references were extracted to include RCT s and OS s that provided data about manic switch prevalence after antidepressant treatment for a major depressive episode. The primary outcome was manic switch prevalence in the different arms of each study. A meta‐regression was conducted to quantify the impact of certain variables on manic switch prevalence. Results A total of 57 papers (35 RCT s and 22 OS s) were included in the main analysis. RCT s underestimated the rate of manic switch [0.53 (0.32–0.87)]. Overestimated prevalence was related to imipraminics [1.85 (1.22–2.79)]; to serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [1.74 (1.06–2.86)]; and to other classes of drugs [1.58 (1.08–2.31)], compared to placebo treatment. The prevalence of manic switch was lower among adults than among children [0.2 (0.07–0.59)]; and higher [20.58 (8.41–50.31)] in case of bipolar disorder. Conclusion Our results highlight an underestimation of the rates of manic switch under antidepressants in RCT s compared to the rates observed in observational studies.