Premium
Altered effective connectivity of the reward network during an incentive‐processing task in adults with alcohol use disorder
Author(s) -
Arias Albert J.,
Ma Liangsuo,
Bjork James M.,
Hammond Christopher J.,
Zhou Yi,
Snyder Andrew,
Moeller Frederick Gerard
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
alcoholism: clinical and experimental research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.267
H-Index - 153
eISSN - 1530-0277
pISSN - 0145-6008
DOI - 10.1111/acer.14650
Subject(s) - impulsivity , insula , dorsolateral prefrontal cortex , psychology , anterior cingulate cortex , alcohol use disorder , ventral striatum , human connectome project , neuroimaging , orbitofrontal cortex , functional magnetic resonance imaging , reward system , neuroscience , striatum , prefrontal cortex , cognition , clinical psychology , alcohol , functional connectivity , biochemistry , chemistry , dopamine
Background Abnormalities of reward sensitivity and impulsivity are known to be correlated with each other and alcohol use disorder (AUD) risk, but the underlying aberrant neural circuitry involved is not clearly defined. We sought to extend the current knowledge of AUD pathophysiology by studying incentive processing in persons with AUD using functional neuroimaging data. Methods We utilized functional MRI data from the Human Connectome Project Database obtained during performance of a number‐guessing incentive‐processing task with win, loss, and neutral feedback conditions in 78 participants with either DSM‐IV alcohol abuse or dependence (combined as the AUD group) and 78 age‐ and sex‐matched control (CON) participants. Within a network consisting of anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), insula, ventral striatum, and dorsal striatum (DS) in the right hemisphere, we performed dynamic causal modeling analysis to test group‐level differences (AUD vs. CON) in effective directional connectivity (EC) as modulated by “win” and “loss” conditions. We used linear regression analyses to characterize the relations between each EC outcome and measures of cumulative alcohol exposure and impulsivity. Results During wins, AUD participants had lower ECs from ACC to the other four nodes, greater ECs from insula to the other four nodes, greater ECs from DLPFC to the other four nodes, and greater DS to DS self‐connection EC than CON participants. In the total sample, EC from the insula to the DLPFC (insula → DLPFC) during wins was positively correlated with both impulsivity (as measured by the delay‐discounting task) and cumulative alcohol exposure. The DS to DS self‐connection EC during wins was positively correlated with impulsivity. Many of the altered ECs from the ACC and insula to other nodes were correlated with cumulative alcohol exposure. Conclusions Individuals with AUD have disrupted EC in both instrumentally driven and automatized corticostriatal reward circuits during non‐alcohol reward feedback. These results point to disrupted corticostriatal EC in both “top‐down” and “bottom‐up” pathways among individuals with AUD.