Premium
High Alcohol–Preferring Mice Show Reaction to Loss of Ethanol Reward Following Repeated Binge Drinking
Author(s) -
Ardinger Cherish E.,
Grahame Nicholas J.,
Lapish Christopher C.,
Linsenbardt David N.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
alcoholism: clinical and experimental research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.267
H-Index - 153
eISSN - 1530-0277
pISSN - 0145-6008
DOI - 10.1111/acer.14419
Subject(s) - binge drinking , alcohol , ethanol , replicate , front (military) , chemistry , alcohol intake , psychology , medicine , endocrinology , zoology , biochemistry , alcohol consumption , biology , mechanical engineering , statistics , mathematics , engineering
Background Beyond yielding high blood ethanol (EtOH) concentrations (BECs), binge‐drinking models allow examination of drinking patterns which may be associated with EtOH’s rewarding effects, including front‐loading and consummatory successive negative contrast (cSNC), a decrease in intake when only water is available to subjects expecting EtOH. The goals of the current study were to broaden our understanding of these reward‐related behaviors during binge EtOH access in high alcohol–preferring (HAP) replicate lines (HAP2 and HAP3) of mice selectively bred to prefer alcohol. We hypothesized that both lines would show evidence of front‐loading during binge EtOH access and that we would find a cSNC effect in groups where EtOH was replaced with water, as these results have been shown previously in HAP1 mice. Methods HAP replicate 2 and replicate 3 female and male mice were given 2 hours of EtOH or water access in the home cage for 15 consecutive days using "drinking in the dark" (DID) procedures. Mice received the same fluid (either 20% unsweetened EtOH or water) for the first 14 days. However, on the 15th day, half of the mice from these 2 groups were provided with the opposite assigned fluid (EtOH groups received water and vice versa). Intake was measured in 1‐minute bins using specialized sipper tubes, which allowed within‐session analyses of binge‐drinking patterns. Results EtOH front‐loading was observed in both replicates. HAP3 mice displayed front‐loading on the first day of EtOH access, whereas front‐loading developed following alcohol experience in HAP2 mice, which may suggest differences in initial sensitivity to EtOH reward. Consummatory SNC, which manifests as lower water intake in mice expecting EtOH as compared to mice expecting water, was observed in both replicates. Conclusions These findings increase confidence that defined changes in home cage consummatory behavior are driven by the incentive value of EtOH. The presence of cSNC across HAP replicates indicates that this reaction to loss of reward is genetically mediated, which suggests that there is a biological mechanism that might be targeted.