Premium
Association Between Gabapentin Receipt for Any Indication and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test—Consumption Scores Among Clinical Subpopulations With and Without Alcohol Use Disorder
Author(s) -
Rentsch Christopher T.,
Fiellin David A.,
Bryant Kendall J.,
Justice Amy C.,
Tate Janet P.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
alcoholism: clinical and experimental research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.267
H-Index - 153
eISSN - 1530-0277
pISSN - 0145-6008
DOI - 10.1111/acer.13953
Subject(s) - medicine , alcohol use disorders identification test , gabapentin , alcohol use disorder , confidence interval , alcohol , emergency medicine , poison control , injury prevention , biochemistry , chemistry , alternative medicine , pathology
Background Current medications for alcohol use disorder ( AUD ) have limited efficacy and utilization. Some clinical trials have shown efficacy for gabapentin among treatment‐seeking individuals. The impact of gabapentin on alcohol consumption in a more general sample remains unknown. Methods We identified patients prescribed gabapentin for ≥180 consecutive days for any clinical indication other than substance use treatment between 2009 and 2015 in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study. We propensity‐score matched each gabapentin‐exposed patient with up to 5 unexposed patients. Multivariable difference‐in‐difference (DiD) linear regression models estimated the differential change in Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test—Consumption ( AUDIT ‐C) scores during follow‐up between exposed and unexposed patients, by baseline level of alcohol consumption and daily gabapentin dose. Analyses were stratified by AUD history. Clinically meaningful changes were a priori considered a DiD ≥1 point. Results Among patients with AUD , AUDIT ‐C scores decreased 0.39 points (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05, 0.73) more among exposed than unexposed patients ( p < 0.03). Potentially clinically meaningful differences were observed among those with AUD and exposed to ≥1,500 mg/d (DiD 0.77, 95% CI 0.15, 1.38, p < 0.02). No statistically significant effects were found among patients with AUD at doses lower than 1,500 mg/d or baseline AUDIT ‐C ≥4. Among patients without AUD , we found no overall difference in changes in AUDIT ‐C scores, nor in analyses stratified by baseline level of alcohol consumption. Conclusions Patients exposed to doses of gabapentin consistent with those used in clinical trials, particularly those with AUD , experienced a greater decrease in AUDIT ‐C scores than matched unexposed patients.