Premium
Do Alcohol Relapse Episodes During Treatment Predict Long‐Term Outcomes? Investigating the Validity of Existing Definitions of Alcohol Use Disorder Relapse
Author(s) -
Maisto Stephen A.,
Roos Corey R.,
Hallgren Kevin A.,
Moskal Dezarie,
Wilson Adam D.,
Witkiewitz Katie
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
alcoholism: clinical and experimental research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.267
H-Index - 153
eISSN - 1530-0277
pISSN - 0145-6008
DOI - 10.1111/acer.13173
Subject(s) - psychosocial , alcohol use disorder , predictive validity , clinical psychology , quality of life (healthcare) , alcohol consumption , relapse prevention , psychology , medicine , psychiatry , alcohol , psychotherapist , biochemistry , chemistry
Background The construct of relapse is used widely in clinical research and practice of alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment. The purpose of this study was to test the predictive validity of commonly appearing definitions of AUD relapse in the empirical literature. Methods Secondary analyses of data from Project MATCH and COMBINE were conducted using 7 definitions of “relapse” based on drinking quantity within a single drinking episode: any drinking; at least 4/5 drinks for women/men; at least 4.3/7.1 drinks for women/men; at least 6/7 drinks for women/men; at least 6 drinks; at least 7/9 drinks for women/men; and at least 8/10 drinks for women/men. Relapse was used to predict alcohol consumption, related consequences, and nonconsumption outcomes (quality of life, psychosocial functioning) at the end of treatment and up to 1 year posttreatment. Results Regression analyses indicated within‐treatment relapse definitions significantly predicted end‐of‐treatment alcohol consumption and alcohol‐related consequences. Heavy drinking definitions were generally more predictive than the any drinking definition, but no single heavy drinking definition was consistently a better predictor of outcomes. Relapse definitions were less predictive of longer‐term alcohol‐related outcomes and both shorter‐ and longer‐term nonconsumption outcomes, including health and psychosocial functioning. Conclusions One particular definition of relapse did not consistently stand out as the best predictor. Advances in AUD research may require reconceptualization of relapse as a multifaceted dynamic process and may consider a wider range of relevant behaviors (e.g., health and psychosocial functioning) when examining the change process in individuals with AUD.