Premium
Hospital Stay and Engagement in Outpatient Follow‐Up After Alcohol Emergency Detox: A 1‐Year Comparison Study
Author(s) -
Azuar Julien,
Questel Frank,
Hispard Eric,
Scott Jan,
Vorspan Florence,
Bellivier Frank
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
alcoholism: clinical and experimental research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.267
H-Index - 153
eISSN - 1530-0277
pISSN - 0145-6008
DOI - 10.1111/acer.12962
Subject(s) - medicine , emergency department , prospective cohort study , detoxification (alternative medicine) , attendance , emergency medicine , outpatient clinic , psychiatry , alternative medicine , pathology , economics , economic growth
Background Inpatient alcohol detoxifications are only proposed after motivational outpatient encounters because detoxification directly from the emergency department (ED) is believed to be associated with early dropout and poor adherence to outpatient follow‐up. The aim of this prospective follow‐up study was to test the feasibility of unscheduled (UP) alcohol detoxification directly from the ED and to compare the 1‐year follow‐up of these patients to that of scheduled (SP) patients. Methods A quasi‐naturalistic prospective follow‐up study of 120 patients: 60 consecutively admitted patients referred directly by the ED for alcohol detoxification ( UP ) were compared to 60 consecutively admitted patients who had undergone the usual preparation for an inpatient detoxification program ( SP ). The length of hospitalization (in days) and attendance to postdischarge outpatient visits during the first year was compared. Results UP patients were older, less frequently employed, and had more somatic comorbidities compared with SP patients. The UP length of stay was significantly longer (20 ± 16 vs. 14 ± 6, p = 0.04). No difference in their postdischarge attendance was observed; the number of patients attending 1 session (57% UP vs. 65% SP , p = 0.227) and 5 sessions (22% UP vs. 32% SP , p = 0.151) and the mean number of postdischarge visits attended were comparable between the UP and SP groups (2.7 ± 6 vs. 4.5 ± 6; Mann–Whitney U = 1,517, p = 0.124). Conclusions We did not find that UP patients who had been admitted for alcohol detoxification had a significantly higher dropout rate or lower postdischarge addiction treatment attendance. Because they may have several advantages, detoxification programs directly linked with EDs should be further evaluated.