z-logo
Premium
Multivariable risk scores for predicting short‐term outcomes for emergency department patients with unexplained syncope: A systematic review
Author(s) -
Sweanor Rachel A. L.,
Redelmeier Robert J.,
Simel David L.,
Albassam Omar T.,
Shadowitz Steven,
Etchells Edward E.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
academic emergency medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1553-2712
pISSN - 1069-6563
DOI - 10.1111/acem.14203
Subject(s) - medicine , emergency department , adverse effect , myocardial infarction , syncope (phonology) , emergency medicine , medline , confidence interval , stroke (engine) , cinahl , risk assessment , psychiatry , mechanical engineering , political science , psychological intervention , law , engineering , computer security , computer science
Objectives Emergency department (ED) patients with unexplained syncope are at risk of experiencing an adverse event within 30 days. Our objective was to systematically review the accuracy of multivariate risk stratification scores for identifying adult syncope patients at high and low risk of an adverse event over the next 30 days. Methods We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, and CINAHL) from database creation until May 2020. We sought studies evaluating prediction scores of adults presenting to an ED with syncope. We included studies that followed patients for up to 30 days to identify adverse events such as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiac surgery. We only included studies with a blinded comparison between baseline clinical features and adverse events. We calculated likelihood ratios and confidence intervals (CIs). Results We screened 13,788 abstracts. We included 17 studies evaluating nine risk stratification scores on 24,234 patient visits, where 7.5% (95% CI = 5.3% to 10%) experienced an adverse event. A Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) of 4 or more was associated with a high likelihood of an adverse event (LR score≥4  = 11, 95% CI = 8.9 to 14). A CSRS of 0 or less (LR score≤0  = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.20) was associated with a low likelihood of an adverse event. Other risk scores were not validated on an independent sample, had low positive likelihood ratios for identifying patients at high risk, or had high negative likelihood ratios for identifying patients at low risk. Conclusion Many risk stratification scores are not validated or not sufficiently accurate for clinical use. The CSRS is an accurate validated prediction score for ED patients with unexplained syncope. Its impact on clinical decision making, admission rates, cost, or outcomes of care is not known.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here