Premium
Reducing Computed Tomography Scan Utilization for Pediatric Minor Head Injury in the Emergency Department: A Quality Improvement Initiative
Author(s) -
Arora Rajan,
White Emily N.,
Niedbala Deborah,
Ravichandran Yagnaram,
Sethuraman Usha,
Radovic Nancy,
Watson Kristin,
Nypaver Michele
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
academic emergency medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1553-2712
pISSN - 1069-6563
DOI - 10.1111/acem.14177
Subject(s) - medicine , emergency department , emergency medicine , confidence interval , computed tomography , quality management , surgery , economics , psychiatry , management system , management
Background The validated Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) prediction rules are meant to aid clinicians in safely reducing unwarranted imaging in children with minor head injuries (MHI). Even so, computed tomography (CT) scan utilization remains high, especially in intermediate‐risk (per PECARN) MHI patients. The primary objective of this quality improvement initiative was to reduce CT utilization rates in the intermediate‐risk MHI patients. Methods This project was conducted in a Level I trauma pediatric emergency department (ED). Children < 18 years evaluated for intermediate‐risk MHI from June 2016 through July 2019 were included. Our key drivers were provider education, decision support, and performance feedback. Our primary outcome was change in head CT utilization rate (%). Balancing measures included return visit within 72 hours of the index visit, ED length of stay (LOS), and clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) on the revisit. We used statistical process control methodology to assess head CT rates over time. Results A total of 1,535 eligible intermediate‐risk MHI patients were analyzed. Our intervention bundle was associated with a decrease in CT use from 18.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 14.5% to 22.5%) in the preintervention period to 13.9% (95% CI = 13.8% to 14.1%) in the postintervention period, an absolute reduction of 4.6% (p = 0.015). Over time, no difference was noted in either ED LOS or return visit rate. There was only one revisit with a ciTBI to our institution during the study period. Conclusions Our multifaceted quality improvement initiative was both safe and effective in reducing our CT utilization rates in children with intermediate‐risk MHI.