z-logo
Premium
D‐dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism
Author(s) -
Kohn Michael A.,
Klok Frederikus A.,
Es Nick
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
academic emergency medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1553-2712
pISSN - 1069-6563
DOI - 10.1111/acem.13191
Subject(s) - medicine , confidence interval , logistic regression , d dimer , pulmonary embolism , statistics , interval (graph theory) , mathematics , combinatorics
Objective The objective was to estimate D‐dimer interval likelihood ratios ( iLR s) for diagnosing pulmonary embolism ( PE ). Methods The authors used pooled patient‐level data from five PE diagnostic management studies to estimate iLR s for the eight D‐dimer intervals with boundaries 250, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,500, 2,500, and 5,000 ng/ mL . Logistic regression was used to fit the data so that an interval increase corresponds to increasing the likelihood ratio by a constant factor. Results The iLR for the D‐dimer interval 1,000–1,499 ng/ mL was essentially 1.0 (0.98 with 95% confidence interval [ CI ] = 0.82–1.18). In the logistic regression model, the constant between‐interval factor was 2.0 (95% CI  = 1.9–2.1). Using these iLR estimates, if the pre–D‐dimer probability of PE is 15%, only a D‐dimer less than 500 ng/ mL will result in a posttest probability below 3%; if the pretest probability is 5%, the threshold for a “negative” D‐dimer is 1,000 ng/ mL . Conclusions A decision strategy based on these approximate iLR s agrees with several published strategies.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom