Premium
Efficacy of a Universal Brief Intervention for Violence Among Urban Emergency Department Youth
Author(s) -
Carter Patrick M.,
Walton Maureen A.,
Zimmerman Marc A.,
Chermack Stephen T.,
Roche Jessica S.,
Cunningham Rebecca M.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
academic emergency medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1553-2712
pISSN - 1069-6563
DOI - 10.1111/acem.13021
Subject(s) - medicine , emergency department , motivational interviewing , poisson regression , intervention (counseling) , brief intervention , poison control , suicide prevention , family medicine , medical emergency , psychiatry , population , environmental health
Background Violent injury is the leading cause of death among urban youth. Emergency department ( ED ) visits represent an opportunity to deliver a brief intervention ( BI ) to reduce violence among youth seeking medical care in high‐risk communities. Objective The objective was to determine the efficacy of a universally applied BI addressing violence behaviors among youth presenting to an urban ED . Methods ED youth (14 to 20 years old) seeking medical or injury‐related care in a Level I ED (October 2011–March 2015) and screening positive for a home address within the intervention or comparison neighborhood of a larger youth violence project were enrolled in this quasi‐experimental study. Based on home address, participants were assigned to receive either the 30‐minute therapist‐delivered BI (Project Sync) or a resource brochure (enhanced usual care [ EUC ] condition). The Project Sync BI combined motivational interviewing and cognitive skills training, including a review of participant goals, tailored feedback, decisional balance exercises, role‐playing exercises, and linkage to community resources. Participants completed validated survey measures at baseline and a 2‐month follow‐up assessment. Main outcome measures included self‐report of physical victimization, aggression, and self‐efficacy to avoid fighting. Poisson and zero‐inflated Poisson regression analyses analyzed the effects of the BI , compared to the EUC condition, on primary outcomes. Results A total of 409 eligible youth (82% participation) were enrolled and assigned to receive either the BI ( n = 263) or the EUC condition ( n = 146). Two‐month follow‐up was 91% ( n = 373). There were no significant baseline differences between study conditions. Among the entire sample, mean (± SD ) age was 17.7 (±1.9) years, 60% were female, 93% were African American, and 79% reported receipt of public assistance. Of participants, 9% presented for a violent injury, 9% reported recent firearm carriage, 20% reported recent alcohol use, and 39% reported recent marijuana use. Compared with the EUC group, participants in the therapist BI group showed self‐reported reductions in frequency of violent aggression (therapist, −46.8%; EUC , −36.9%; incident rate ratio [ IRR ] = 0.87; 95% confidence interval [ CI ] = 0.76 to 0.99) and increased self‐efficacy for avoiding fighting (therapist, +7.2%; EUC , −1.3%; IRR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.15). No significant changes were noted for victimization. Conclusions Among youth seeking ED care in a high‐risk community, a brief, universally applied BI shows promise in increased self‐efficacy for avoiding fighting and a decrease in the frequency of violent aggression.