Premium
Emergency Department Performance Measures Updates: Proceedings of the 2014 Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance Consensus Summit
Author(s) -
Wiler Jennifer L.,
Welch Shari,
Pines Jesse,
Schuur Jeremiah,
Jouriles Nick,
StoneGriffith Suzanne
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
academic emergency medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1553-2712
pISSN - 1069-6563
DOI - 10.1111/acem.12654
Subject(s) - benchmarking , emergency department , medicine , staffing , terminology , summit , health care , medical emergency , nursing , business , linguistics , philosophy , marketing , physical geography , economic growth , economics , geography
Objectives The objective was to review and update key definitions and metrics for emergency department ( ED ) performance and operations. Methods Forty‐five emergency medicine leaders convened for the Third Performance Measures and Benchmarking Summit held in Las Vegas, February 21–22, 2014. Prior to arrival, attendees were assigned to workgroups to review, revise, and update the definitions and vocabulary being used to communicate about ED performance and operations. They were provided with the prior definitions of those consensus summits that were published in 2006 and 2010. Other published definitions from key stakeholders in emergency medicine and health care were also reviewed and circulated. At the summit, key terminology and metrics were discussed and debated. Workgroups communicated online, via teleconference, and finally in a face‐to‐face meeting to reach consensus regarding their recommendations. Recommendations were then posted and open to a 30‐day comment period. Participants then reanalyzed the recommendations, and modifications were made based on consensus. Results A comprehensive dictionary of ED terminology related to ED performance and operation was developed. This article includes definitions of operating characteristics and internal and external factors relevant to the stratification and categorization of ED s. Time stamps, time intervals, and measures of utilization were defined. Definitions of processes and staffing measures are also presented. Definitions were harmonized with performance measures put forth by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ( CMS ) for consistency. Conclusions Standardized definitions are necessary to improve the comparability of ED s nationally for operations research and practice. More importantly, clear precise definitions describing ED operations are needed for incentive‐based pay‐for‐performance models like those developed by CMS . This document provides a common language for front‐line practitioners, managers, health policymakers, and researchers.