Premium
El Retraso en la Realizacion del Examen de Cualificación de la American Board of Emergency Medicine Se Asocia con un Peor Rendimiento
Author(s) -
Marco Catherine A.,
Counselman Francis L.,
Korte Robert C.,
Purosky Robert G.,
Whitley Cameron Thomas,
Reisdorff Earl J.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
academic emergency medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1553-2712
pISSN - 1069-6563
DOI - 10.1111/acem.12391
Subject(s) - medicine , physical examination , test (biology) , oral examination , empirical examination , final examination , neurological examination , objective structured clinical examination , physical therapy , family medicine , surgery , nursing , medical education , paleontology , classical economics , oral health , economics , biology
Objectives The initial step in certification by the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) requires passing a multiple‐choice‐question qualifying examination. The qualifying examination is typically taken in the first year after residency training. This study was undertaken to determine if a delay in taking the qualifying examination is associated with poorer performance. The authors also examined the relationship between in‐training examination scores and qualifying examination scores. Methods This was a pooled time‐series cross‐section study. Primary measurements were initial qualifying examination scores, the timing of the qualifying examination, and in‐training examination scores. The three groups, based on qualifying examination timing, were immediate, 1‐year delay, and ≥2‐year delay. In‐training examination scores were analyzed to determine the relationship between intrinsic ability, examination timing, and qualifying examination scores. For analysis, a generic pooled ordinary least‐squares dummy variable model with robust standard errors was used. A pre hoc level of significance was determined to be α < 0.01. Results There were 16,353 qualifying examination test administrations between 2000 and 2012. In‐training examination scores were positively correlated with qualifying examination scores (p < 0.001). The group pass rates were 98.9% immediate, 95.6% 1‐year delay, and 86.6% ≥2‐year delay. After controlling for in‐training examination scores, delay taking the qualifying examination of 1 year was associated with a decrease in score of –0.6 (p = 0.003). A delay in taking the qualifying examination ≥2 years was associated with a decrease in score of –2.5 points (p < 0.001). Conclusions After accounting for innate ability using in‐training examination scores, delay taking the qualifying examination was associated with poorer performance. This effect was more pronounced if the delay was ≥2 years.