Premium
ICU discharge screening for prediction of new‐onset physical disability—A multinational cohort study
Author(s) -
Milton Anna,
Schandl Anna,
Soliman Iwo,
JoelssonAlm Eva,
Boogaard Mark,
Wallin Ewa,
Brorsson Camilla,
Östberg Ulrika,
Latocha Kristine,
Savilampi Johanna,
Paskins Stinne,
Bottai Matteo,
Sackey Peter
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1399-6576
pISSN - 0001-5172
DOI - 10.1111/aas.13563
Subject(s) - medicine , confidence interval , odds ratio , logistic regression , intensive care unit , cohort , receiver operating characteristic , prospective cohort study , cohort study , incidence (geometry) , physical therapy , psychological intervention , emergency medicine , pediatrics , physics , psychiatry , optics
Background Methods to identify patients at risk for incomplete physical recovery after intensive care unit (ICU) stay are lacking. Our aim was to develop a method for prediction of new‐onset physical disability at ICU discharge. Methods Multinational prospective cohort study in 10 general ICUs in Sweden, Denmark, and the Netherlands. Adult patients with an ICU stay ≥12 hours were eligible for inclusion. Sixteen candidate predictors were analyzed with logistic regression for associations with the primary outcome; new‐onset physical disability 3 months post‐ICU, defined as a ≥10 score reduction in the Barthel Index (BI) compared to baseline. Results Of the 572 included patients, follow‐up data are available on 78% of patients alive at follow‐up. The incidence of new‐onset physical disability was 19%. Univariable and multivariable modeling rendered one sole predictor for the outcome: physical status at ICU discharge, assessed with the five first items of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool (CPAx) (odds ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81‐0.93), a higher score indicating a lower risk, with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.68 (95% CI 0.61‐0.76). Negative predictive value for a low‐risk group (CPAx score >18) was 0.88, and positive predictive value for a high‐risk group (CPAx score ≤18) was 0.32. Conclusion The ICU discharge assessment described in this study had a moderate AUC but may be useful to rule out patients unlikely to need physical interventions post‐ICU. For high‐risk patients, research to determine post‐ICU risk factors for an incomplete rehabilitation is mandated.