Premium
Transpulmonary driving pressure during mechanical ventilation–validation of a non‐invasive measurement method
Author(s) -
Gudmundsson Magni,
Persson Per,
Perchiazzi Gaetano,
Lundin Stefan,
Rylander Christian
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1399-6576
pISSN - 0001-5172
DOI - 10.1111/aas.13482
Subject(s) - transpulmonary pressure , medicine , mechanical ventilation , repeatability , intraclass correlation , coefficient of variation , intensive care unit , intensive care , positive end expiratory pressure , limits of agreement , peak inspiratory pressure , anesthesia , lung volumes , nuclear medicine , tidal volume , lung , intensive care medicine , respiratory system , mathematics , statistics , psychometrics , clinical psychology
Background Transpulmonary driving pressure plays an important role in today's understanding of ventilator induced lung injury. We have previously validated a novel non‐invasive method based on stepwise increments of PEEP to assess transpulmonary driving pressure in anaesthetised patients with healthy lungs. The aim of this study was to validate the method in patients who were mechanically ventilated for different diagnoses requiring intensive care. Methods We measured transpulmonary pressure (Ptp) and calculated transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔPtp) in 31 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit. Parallel triplicate measurements were performed with the PEEP step method (PtpPSM) and the conventional oesophageal balloon method (Ptpconv). Their agreement was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland Altman plot. Result The coefficient of variation for the repeated measurements was 4,3 for ΔPtpPSM and 9,2 for ΔPtpconv. The ICC of 0,864 and the Bland Altman plot indicate good agreement between the two methods. Conclusion The non‐invasive method can be applied in mechanically ventilated patients to measure transpulmonary driving pressure with good repeatability and accuracy comparable to the traditional oesophageal balloon method.