z-logo
Premium
Prevention of rhabdomyolysis‐induced acute kidney injury – A DASAIM/DSIT clinical practice guideline
Author(s) -
Michelsen Jens,
Cordtz Joakim,
Liboriussen Lisbeth,
Behzadi Meike T.,
Ibsen Michael,
Damholt Mette B.,
Møller Morten H.,
Wiis Jørgen
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1399-6576
pISSN - 0001-5172
DOI - 10.1111/aas.13308
Subject(s) - medicine , guideline , intensive care medicine , quality of evidence , psychological intervention , evidence based medicine , rhabdomyolysis , acute kidney injury , grading (engineering) , trustworthiness , sodium bicarbonate , randomized controlled trial , nursing , alternative medicine , pathology , civil engineering , computer security , computer science , engineering , chemistry
Background Rhabdomyolysis‐induced acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and serious condition. We aimed to summarise the available evidence on this topic and provide recommendations according to current standards for trustworthy guidelines. Methods This guideline was developed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). The following preventive interventions were assessed: (a) fluids, (b) diuretics, (c) alkalinisation, (d) antioxidants, and (e) renal replacement therapy. Exclusively patient‐important outcomes were assessed. Results We suggest using early rather than late fluid resuscitation (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence). We suggest using crystalloids rather than colloids (weak recommendation, low quality of evidence). We suggest against routine use of loop diuretics as compared to none (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence). We suggest against use of mannitol as compared to none (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence). We suggest against routine use of any diuretic as compared to none (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence). We suggest against routine use of alkalinisation with sodium bicarbonate as compared to none (weak recommendation, low quality of evidence). We suggest against the routine use of any alkalinisation as compared to none (weak recommendation, low quality of evidence). We suggest against routine use of renal replacement therapy as compared to none (weak recommendation, low quality of evidence). For the remaining PICO questions, no recommendations were issued. Conclusion The quantity and quality of evidence supporting preventive interventions for rhabdomyolysis‐induced AKI is low/very low. We were able to issue eight weak recommendations and no strong recommendations.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here