Premium
Central venous pressure: we need to bring clinical use into physiological context
Author(s) -
SONDERGAARD S.,
PARKIN G.,
ANEMAN A.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1399-6576
pISSN - 0001-5172
DOI - 10.1111/aas.12490
Subject(s) - central venous pressure , medicine , context (archaeology) , intravascular volume status , venous return curve , resuscitation , intensive care medicine , intensive care , venous pressure , cardiac output , hemodynamics , blood pressure , anesthesia , heart rate , paleontology , biology
Background The place of central venous pressure ( CVP ) measurement in acute care has been questioned during the past decade. We reviewed its physiological importance, utility and clinical use among anaesthetists and intensivists. Methods A literature search using the P ub M ed, C ochrane, S copus and W eb of S cience databases was performed in regard to details of the physiology, measurement and interpretation of CVP . A questionnaire was conducted among members of the E uropean S ociety of I ntensive C are M edicine concerning knowledge and uses of CVP. Results Aligning pressure transducers to the phlebostatic axis was handled inadequately. The unsuitability of CVP to assess the intravascular volume state was generally recognised by clinicians. Still, many used CVP to guide volume resuscitation in the absence of a cardiac output monitor, while the literature positioned CVP as a useful haemodynamic variable only in the expanded context of being one determinant of the driving pressure for venous return and hence cardiac output. Conclusion The correct measurement of CVP is pivotal to its proper clinical application. This relates to defining the pressure gradient for venous return and heart efficiency. The clinical appreciation of CVP should be restored by educational efforts of its physiological context.