Premium
Relationships Among NANDA ‐ I Diagnoses, N ursing O utcomes C lassification, and N ursing I nterventions C lassification by Nursing Students for Patients in Medical‐Surgical Units in K orea
Author(s) -
Noh Hyun Kyung,
Lee Eunjoo
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
international journal of nursing knowledge
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.545
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 2047-3095
pISSN - 2047-3087
DOI - 10.1111/2047-3095.12044
Subject(s) - nursing interventions classification , nursing outcomes classification , psychological intervention , nursing , medicine , nursing diagnosis , medical diagnosis , nursing process , medical record , documentation , medline , nursing practice , family medicine , nurse education , primary nursing , pathology , computer science , political science , law , programming language
Purpose The purpose of this study was to identify NANDA ‐ I , N ursing O utcomes C lassification ( NOC ), and N ursing I nterventions C lassification ( NIC ; NNN ) linkages used by K orean nursing students during their clinical practice in medical‐surgical units. Methods A comparative descriptive research design was used to measure the effects of nursing interventions from 153 nursing students in S outh K orea. Nursing students selected NNN using a W eb‐based nursing process documentation system. Data were analyzed by paired t ‐test. Results Eighty‐two NANDA ‐ I diagnoses, 116 NOC outcomes, and 163 NIC interventions were identified. Statistically significant differences in patients' preintervention and postintervention outcome scores were observed. Conclusion By determining patient outcomes linked to interventions and how the degree of outcomes change after interventions, the effectiveness of the interventions can be evaluated.