
Pretreatment body mass index predicts survival among patients administered nivolumab monotherapy for pretreated non‐small cell lung cancer
Author(s) -
Imai Hisao,
Naito Erika,
Yamaguchi Ou,
Hashimoto Kosuke,
Iemura Hidetoshi,
Miura Yu,
Shiono Ayako,
Mouri Atsuto,
Kaira Kyoichi,
Kobayashi Kunihiko,
Kagamu Hiroshi
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
thoracic cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.823
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 1759-7714
pISSN - 1759-7706
DOI - 10.1111/1759-7714.14417
Subject(s) - medicine , nivolumab , lung cancer , body mass index , oncology , progression free survival , log rank test , biomarker , performance status , survival analysis , overall survival , cancer , immunotherapy , biochemistry , chemistry
Background Biomarker assessments for nivolumab monotherapy efficacy in previously treated patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain unclear. We evaluated whether body mass index (BMI) and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) are useful for assessing the efficacy of nivolumab alone as a second‐line treatment in patients with pretreated NSCLC. Methods Data of 99 patients treated with second‐line nivolumab monotherapy for NSCLC between January 2016 and December 2019 were evaluated for prognostic values of BMI and GPS to assess their usefulness in predicting progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group‐performance status (PS) independently predicted the second‐line nivolumab monotherapeutic effect; good PS (0–1) correlated with significantly longer PFS (4.3 vs. 1.9 months, log‐rank; p = 0.0004) and OS (17.7 vs. 4.6 months, log‐rank; p < 0.0001) than poor PS. BMI independently predicted survival, with high BMI (≥22.1 kg/m 2 ) associated with significantly longer OS (19.1 vs. 8.5 months, log‐rank; p = 0.0023) than low BMI (<22.1 kg/m 2 ). However, GPS showed no significant difference for PFS or OS. Conclusion Among patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab monotherapy as second‐line treatment, PS was significantly correlated with both PFS and OS and BMI with OS. Thus, BMI could be a useful predictor of survival in these patients.