Premium
An Uneven Playing Field: Rankings and Ratings for Economics in ERA 2010
Author(s) -
Bloch Harry
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
economic papers: a journal of applied economics and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.245
H-Index - 19
eISSN - 1759-3441
pISSN - 0812-0439
DOI - 10.1111/1759-3441.12004
Subject(s) - excellence , economics , quality (philosophy) , field (mathematics) , positive economics , applied economics , information economics , public economics , econometrics , microeconomics , political science , mathematics , epistemology , philosophy , pure mathematics , law
In the evaluation of research quality conducted under Excellence in Research for Australia 2010, the sub‐disciplines of econometrics and theory were rated more highly than the sub‐disciplines of applied economics and other economics. The rating in each sub‐discipline was benchmarked against a world standard, so the results suggest that Australian economists produce relatively better econometric or theory research than applied or other economics research. However, closer examination of the processes on which the ratings were based suggests built‐in biases that favour theory and econometric research over applied and other economics research, leaving the relative quality of research in the various sub‐disciplines open to question.