Premium
The Selective Closure of Civic Space
Author(s) -
Roggeband Conny,
Krizsán Andrea
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
global policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.602
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1758-5899
pISSN - 1758-5880
DOI - 10.1111/1758-5899.12973
Subject(s) - civil society , democracy , face (sociological concept) , state (computer science) , realm , space (punctuation) , closure (psychology) , government (linguistics) , politics , power (physics) , political science , sociology , public administration , political economy , law , social science , linguistics , philosophy , physics , algorithm , quantum mechanics , computer science
Scholars and NGOs have been raising alarms about the increasing political restraints that civil society organizations face globally. In this paper, we argue that closure is in fact a selective mechanism: governments attempt to reorganize civic space through a dual process of selective in‐ and exclusion of civil society organizations. Civil society organizations identified as critical of or even anti‐government face obstruction and restraints, whereas simultaneously the space and state support for organizations identified as pro‐government is expanded. Governments instrumentalize certain civil society organizations to their own benefit: they are sponsored and used to influence the realm of civil society in ways that directly legitimize state power and maintain an appearance of democracy. We illustrate our claims by discussing the reorganization of civic space in some countries of Central and Eastern Europe through the case of women’s rights activism.