Premium
Sustainable Health Care Financing: The Singapore Experience
Author(s) -
Lim Jeremy
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
global policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.602
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1758-5899
pISSN - 1758-5880
DOI - 10.1111/1758-5899.12247
Subject(s) - equity (law) , government (linguistics) , prudence , subsidy , health care , revenue , economic growth , population , business , fiscal sustainability , finance , economics , public administration , political science , medicine , environmental health , debt , philosophy , linguistics , theology , law , market economy
The Singapore health system has been lauded for achieving impressive population health outcomes utilizing only a modest 4–5 per cent of GDP , with the government's share only one third of this. Measured health spending is consistent with a larger government commitment to fiscal prudence and discipline in balancing budgets. In fact, the Singapore constitution permits a government to only spend revenue raised during its term of office. Drawing down of national reserves can only be done during exceptional circumstances and requires specific approval from the president. However, the sustainability of Singapore's health system is under pressure from changing demographics, disease trends and growing demands from citizens for greater equity and expanded health care services. In the face of these challenges, the Singaporean government has responded by introducing three major costly policy reforms: the Pioneer Generation Package, to help elderly people pay for medical treatment; MediShield Life, to expand insurance coverage; and the Community Health Assistance Scheme ( CHAS ), to provide government subsidies for primary care for those that qualify. Despite the expansion of funding and services, the government remains committed to the longstanding principles of fiscal prudence and not drawing from past reserves.