z-logo
Premium
Patent pools, litigation, and innovation
Author(s) -
Choi Jay Pil,
Gerlach Heiko
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the rand journal of economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.687
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1756-2171
pISSN - 0741-6261
DOI - 10.1111/1756-2171.12095
Subject(s) - license , incentive , patent troll , patent infringement , business , intellectual property , welfare , law and economics , social welfare , industrial organization , economics , patent law , law , microeconomics , market economy , political science
This article analyzes patent pools and their effects on litigation incentives, overall royalty rates, and social welfare when patent rights are probabilistic and can be invalidated in court. With probabilistic patents, the license fees reflect the strength of the patents. We show that patent pools of complementary patents can be used to discourage infringement by depriving potential licensees of the ability to selectively challenge patents and making them committed to a proposition of all‐or‐nothing in patent litigation. If patents are sufficiently weak, patent pools with complementary patents reduce social welfare as they charge higher licensing fees and chill subsequent innovation incentives.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here