Premium
Potential benefits of biologics on stroke and mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A nationwide population‐based cohort study in Taiwan
Author(s) -
Tang ChaoHsiun,
Yu Fun,
Huang ChingYa,
Chen DerYuan
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal of rheumatic diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.795
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1756-185X
pISSN - 1756-1841
DOI - 10.1111/1756-185x.13611
Subject(s) - medicine , rheumatoid arthritis , hazard ratio , cohort , proportional hazards model , stroke (engine) , incidence (geometry) , concomitant , confidence interval , mechanical engineering , physics , optics , engineering
Aim To examine the changes in the risks of death and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with conventional synthetic or biologic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD or bDMARD) during 1997‐2013. Methods Two cohorts of RA patients and their matched controls were identified from the National Health Insurance Research database. There were 1569 patients in the csDMARD cohort who received cyclosporine ≥50 mg/d with concomitant usage of ≥2 csDMARDs during 1997‐2003. There were 1530 patients in the bDMARD cohort if patients had ≥1 claim for bDMARD during 2003‐2011. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for the risk of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke, were assessed using the Kaplan‐Meier survival curves and the Cox proportional hazards models. Results Compared with matched cohorts, the incidence of death was higher with csDMARD with a more than 6‐fold increase (csDMARD vs controls: 33% vs 5%); while it only increased with a much smaller magnitude with bDMARD (bDMARD vs controls: 15% vs 11%). In addition, an increase in the reduction of incidence rate of stroke with bDMARD (bDMARD vs controls: 2% vs 5%) than that with csDMARD (csDMARD vs controls: 3% vs 4%) was found. Results from multivariate analysis showed that RA patients receiving bDMARD had a significantly lower increase in the risk of deaths (aHR 1.05; 95% CI 0.84‐1.33) compared with those receiving csDMARD (aHR 8.75; 95% CI 7.43‐10.31). In addition, bDMARD was associated with a higher reduction in the risk of stroke compared with csDMARD (bDMARD: aHR 0.37; 95% CI 0.22‐0.62; csDMARD: aHR 0.73; 95% CI 0.51‐1.05). Conclusion Biologics used in RA patients have been shown to have a beneficial impact on improving clinical outcomes, including decreased risks of death and stroke. The economic burden from costs of biologics may be alleviated by improving outcomes.