z-logo
Premium
Prevalence of secondary Sjögren's syndrome in Indian patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a single‐center study
Author(s) -
Santosh Krishna,
Dhir Varun,
Singh Surjit,
Sood Ashwani,
Gupta Amit,
Sharma Aman,
Sharma Shefali
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
international journal of rheumatic diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.795
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1756-185X
pISSN - 1756-1841
DOI - 10.1111/1756-185x.13017
Subject(s) - medicine , rheumatoid arthritis , sss* , rheumatology , interquartile range , sicca syndrome , gastroenterology , disease
Aim To assess the prevalence of secondary Sjögren's syndrome ( sSS ) and its association with joint damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis ( RA ) from northern India. Methods Patients included had RA , fulfilling the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria, with disease duration of more than 1 year. They were administered a sicca questionnaire that included six questions from subjective criteria of American European Consensus Group ( AECG ) criteria. Those who answered affirmatively to at least one question underwent Schirmer I test (ocular function) and salivary scintigraphy (salivary gland involvement). Patients with involvement of both were classified as having sSS as per AECG criteria. A damaged joint count was done using Norfolk Arthritis Register Damaged Joint Count ( NOAR ‐ DJC ). Results This study included 199 patients with RA , with mean ( SD ) age and disease duration of 44 (9.9) and 6.8 (5.5) years, respectively. The prevalence of sicca symptoms and sSS was 14.6% and 5.5%, respectively. Those having sSS had a longer (mean ± SD ) disease duration (9.2 ± 4.0, 6.8 ± 5.5 years, P = 0.07) and were significantly older in age (50.8 ± 6.8, 43.6 ± 9.9 years, P = 0.005) than those without sSS . There was no significant difference in the median (interquartile range) damaged joint count (0 (0–2), 0 (0–2), P = 0.75) .Conclusions The prevalence of sSS in northern Indian RA patients was 5.5%, and it was significantly associated with older age but not damaged joint count.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here