z-logo
Premium
Prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders and validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as a screening tool in axial spondyloarthritis patients
Author(s) -
Chan Cynthia Y. Y.,
Tsang Helen H. L.,
Lau C. S.,
Chung H. Y.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
international journal of rheumatic diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.795
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1756-185X
pISSN - 1756-1841
DOI - 10.1111/1756-185x.12456
Subject(s) - hospital anxiety and depression scale , anxiety , medicine , depression (economics) , major depressive disorder , psychiatry , mood , economics , macroeconomics
Objective To determine the prevalence of anxiety and depression in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients by a psychiatrist using the Chinese‐bilingual Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , fourth edition patient research version ( CB ‐ SCID ‐I/P), and to examine the effectiveness of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ( HADS ) as a screening tool. Methods We recruited 160 Chinese axial‐SpA patients to determine the prevalence of anxiety and depression using the CB ‐ SCID ‐I/P. Recruited subjects were asked to complete the HADS . HADS , HADS ‐depression ( HADS ‐D) subscale and HADS ‐anxiety ( HADS ‐A) subscale were analyzed to determine their effectiveness in screening for depressive and anxiety disorders. Results The prevalence of current major depressive disorder ( MDD ) and anxiety disorder were 10.6% and 15.6%, respectively. The full‐scale HADS outperformed the HADS ‐D subscale in screening for current MDD (area under the curve [ AUC ] 0.889; 0.844) and all depressive disorders ( AUC 0.885; 0.862) while the HADS ‐A subscale outperformed the full scale HADS in screening for anxiety disorders ( AUC 0.894; 0.846). The optimal cut‐off point of the full scale HADS for screening current MDD and all depressive disorders were 7/8 and 6/7, yielding a sensitivity of 82.4% and 83.9%, specificity of 78.7% and 74.8%, respectively. The optimal cut‐off point of HADS ‐A subscale for screening anxiety disorders was 6/7, yielding a sensitivity of 88.0% and specificity of 74.4%. Conclusion The prevalence of MDD and anxiety disorder in SpA patients were 10.6% and 15.6%, respectively. We recommend using the full‐scale HADS in screening for depressive disorders and HADS ‐A subscale for anxiety disorders.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here