z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative performance of pharmacogenetics‐based warfarin dosing algorithms derived from Caucasian, Asian, and mixed races in Thai population
Author(s) -
Chumnumwat Supatat,
Yi Kong,
Lucksiri Aroonrut,
Nosoongnoen Wichit,
Chindavijak Busba,
Chulavatnatol Suvatna,
Sarapakdi Ajjima,
Nathisuwan Surakit
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
cardiovascular therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.818
H-Index - 46
eISSN - 1755-5922
pISSN - 1755-5914
DOI - 10.1111/1755-5922.12315
Subject(s) - dosing , medicine , warfarin , algorithm , population , pharmacogenetics , maintenance dose , mathematics , atrial fibrillation , biology , biochemistry , environmental health , genotype , gene
Summary Aim This study was conducted to compare predictive accuracy of the available pharmacogenetics ( PG x)‐guided warfarin dosing algorithms derived from Caucasian, Asian, and mixed population to identify a suitable algorithm for Thai population. Methods Ten warfarin dosing algorithms derived from different population including Caucasian, East Asian, South‐East Asian, and mixed races were selected and tested with clinical and genetic data of Thai patients. Comparative performances of these algorithms were tested using mean dose error ( MDE ) between actual warfarin maintenance dose ( AWMD ) and predicted dose generated by each dosing algorithm, and percentage of ideal dose prediction ( IDP ). Sensitivity analysis for predictive accuracy was also conducted by stratifying patients into low ( AWMD ≤21 mg/wk), intermediate ( AWMD >21 to <49 mg/wk), and high maintenance dose ( AWMD ≥49 mg/wk) groups. Results Data of 165 patients were included for the analyses. Mean actual warfarin dose of the study population was 25.03 ± 10.53 mg/wk. Large variability of MDE , ranging from −12.11 to 11.24 mg/wk, among algorithms was observed. International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium, Gage et al, and Ohno et al algorithms had comparable performances to Sangviroon et al algorithm, as observed by MDE of <1 mg/wk with percentage of IDP ≥40%. Further sensitivity analyses among patients requiring low and intermediate maintenance doses confirmed such findings with IDP percentage ranging from 37.8% to 59.2%. Among high‐dose group, only Ohno et al and Sarapakdi et al algorithms had acceptable performance. Conclusions Warfarin PG x‐guided dosing algorithms derived from large, mixed population performed comparably to Sangviroon et al algorithm. Certain algorithms should be avoided due to significant dose prediction error.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here