z-logo
Premium
Classification of normal screening mammograms is strongly influenced by perceived mammographic breast density
Author(s) -
Ang Zoey ZY,
Rawashdeh Mohammad A,
Heard Rob,
Brennan Patrick C,
Lee Warwick,
Lewis Sarah J
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.31
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1754-9485
pISSN - 1754-9477
DOI - 10.1111/1754-9485.12576
Subject(s) - medicine , mammography , mammographic density , breast density , bi rads , audiology , breast cancer , cancer
To investigate how breast screen readers classify normal screening cases using descriptors of normal mammographic features and to assess test cases for suitability for a single reading strategy. Methods Fifteen breast screen readers interpreted a test set of 29 normal screening cases and classified them by firstly rating their perceived difficulty to reach a ‘normal’ decision, secondly identifying the cases' salient normal mammographic features and thirdly assessing the cases' suitability for a single reading strategy. Results The relationship between the perceived difficulty in making ‘normal’ decisions and the normal mammographic features was investigated. Regular ductal pattern ( T b  = −0.439, P  = 0.001), uniform density ( T b  = −0.527, P  < 0.001), non‐dense breasts ( T b  = −0.736, P  < 0.001), symmetrical mammographic features ( T b  = −0.474, P  = 0.001) and overlapped density ( T b  = 0.630, P  < 0.001) had a moderate to strong correlation with the difficulty to make ‘normal’ decisions. Cases with regular ductal pattern ( T b  = 0.447, P  = 0.002), uniform density ( T b  = 0.550, P  < 0.001), non‐dense breasts ( T b  = 0.748, P  < 0.001) and symmetrical mammographic features ( T b  = 0.460, P  = 0.001) were considered to be more suitable for single reading, whereas cases with overlapped density were not ( T b  = −0.679, P  < 0.001). Conclusion The findings suggest that perceived mammographic breast density has a major influence on the difficulty for readers to classify cases as normal and hence their suitability for single reading.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here