z-logo
Premium
CT angiography of the aorta using 80  kVp in combination with sinogram‐affirmed iterative reconstruction and automated tube current modulation: Effects on image quality and radiation dose
Author(s) -
Boos Johannes,
Aissa Joel,
Lanzman Rotem S,
Heusch Philipp,
Schimmöller Lars,
Schleich Christoph,
Thomas Christoph,
Antoch Gerald,
Kröpil Patric
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.31
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1754-9485
pISSN - 1754-9477
DOI - 10.1111/1754-9485.12425
Subject(s) - medicine , image quality , nuclear medicine , effective dose (radiation) , computed tomography angiography , abdominal aorta , iterative reconstruction , image noise , angiography , radiology , radiation dose , aorta , surgery , image (mathematics) , artificial intelligence , computer science
The objective of this study was to evaluate image quality and radiation dose of a CT angiography ( CTA ) protocol using 80  kVp in combination with iterative reconstruction and automated tube current modulation. Methods Ninety‐five aortic CTA examinations were included in this study. A novel 80  kVp aortic CTA ‐protocol with iterative reconstruction was introduced in our department in March 2012 for patients with a body mass index ( BMI ) below 32 kg/m 2 . The first 72 consecutive examinations were retrospectively assigned to group A (56 patients, 42 men, 14 women, mean age 69.6 ± 10.7years, BMI range 19.7–31.1 kg/m 2 ). For comparison, the last 23 consecutive examinations performed with the old protocol (100  kVp ) were assigned to group B (21 patients, 13 men, 8 women, mean age 67.4 ± 11.1years, BMI range 19.7–31.9 kg/m 2 ). Thoracic and abdominal contrast‐to‐noise ratio ( CNR ), signal‐to‐noise ratio ( SNR ) and aortic attenuation were assessed. Subjective image quality was rated on a 5‐point scale (1 =  non diagnostic ; 5 =  excellent ). Furthermore, dose length product ( DLP ) and volumetric computed tomography dose index ( CTDI vol ) were analysed. Results All examinations achieved diagnostic image quality. Attenuation of the aorta was significantly higher in group A compared with B (thoracic: 443.5 ± 90.5 H ounsfield units ( HU ) vs. 296.0 ± 61.0  HU ; abdominal: 426.3 ± 94.2  HU vs. 283.6 ± 60.5  HU ; P  < 0.05, respectively). CNR , SNR and subjective image quality were comparable between both groups ( CNR : 12.8 ± 3.7 vs. 13.0 ± 7.4; SNR 14.4 ± 3.9 vs. 14.9 ± 8.2; subjective image quality: 4.3 ± 0.6 vs. 4.5 ± 0.6; P  > 0.05, respectively). CTDI vol and DLP were significantly lower in group A (1.9 ± 0.5  mGy ; 139.2 ± 41.1  mGy × cm ) as compared with group B (4.2 ± 1.4  mGy ; 292.1 ± 91.5  mGy × cm ; P  < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Low‐dose CTA of the aorta using 80  kVp with iterative reconstruction enables a significant dose reduction of up to 50% compared with a 100  kVp protocol in patients with a BMI below 32 kg/m 2 while diagnostic image quality is maintained.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom