Premium
M ultidetector CT diagnosis of non‐traumatic gastroduodenal perforation
Author(s) -
Lee Dabee,
Park Mihyun,
Shin Byung Seok,
Jeon Gyeong Sik
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.31
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1754-9485
pISSN - 1754-9477
DOI - 10.1111/1754-9485.12408
Subject(s) - medicine , perforation , thickening , radiology , ascites , multidetector computed tomography , gastrointestinal perforation , predictive value , computed tomography , peritonitis , chemistry , materials science , polymer science , punching , metallurgy
To identify reliable CT features and assess the diagnostic performance of 64‐multidetector CT ( MDCT ) in diagnosing non‐traumatic gastroduodenal perforation ( GDP ). Methods We retrospectively reviewed 136 CT scans of patients with surgically proven non‐traumatic gastrointestinal perforation during 7 years. 92 patients had GDP and 44 patients had other sites of perforation. CT features of perforation were evaluated and the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of each CT feature were estimated. Results The cause of GDP was peptic ulcer in 90 patients, gastric cancer in one patient, and foreign body of duodenal diverticulum in one patient. Extraluminal gas (97%) was most common CT feature of GDP , following by fluid or fat strand along gastroduodenum (89%), ascites (89%), wall defect and/or ulcer (84%), and wall thickening (72%). Of CT features, wall defect and/or ulcer showed the best positive likelihood ratios for GDP (36.83). Wall thickening also showed high positive likelihood ratios (10.52). Combined, these CT features showed 95% sensitivity and 93% specificity for localization of perforation site of GDP . Conclusion MDCT is useful in diagnosis of presence and site of GDP . Wall defect and/or ulcer and wall thickening have a high positive predictive value for localization of perforation site.