z-logo
Premium
256‐ MDCT for evaluation of urolithiasis: Iterative reconstruction allows for a significant reduction of the applied radiation dose while maintaining high subjective and objective image quality
Author(s) -
Veldhoen Simon,
Laqmani Azien,
Derlin Thorsten,
Karul Murat,
Hammerle Diego,
Buhk JanHendrik,
Sehner Susanne,
Nagel Hans D.,
Chun Felix,
Adam Gerhard,
Regier Marc
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.31
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1754-9485
pISSN - 1754-9477
DOI - 10.1111/1754-9485.12159
Subject(s) - medicine , radiation dose , image quality , nuclear medicine , effective dose (radiation) , radiation exposure , protocol (science) , multidetector computed tomography , radiology , iterative reconstruction , reduction (mathematics) , computed tomography , image (mathematics) , artificial intelligence , alternative medicine , pathology , computer science , geometry , mathematics
Purpose Multidetector CT ( MDCT ) is the established imaging modality in diagnostics of urolithiasis. The aim of iterative reconstruction ( IR ) is to allow for a radiation dose reduction while maintaining high image quality. This study evaluates its performance in MDCT for assessment of urolithiasis. Materials and Methods Fifty‐two patients underwent non‐contrast abdominal MDCT . Twenty‐six patients were referred to MDCT under suspicion of urolithiasis, and examined using a dose‐reduced scan protocol ( RDCT ). Twenty‐six patients, who had undergone standard‐dose MDCT , served as reference for radiation dose comparison. RDCT images were reconstructed using an IR system (i D ose4™, P hilips H ealthcare, C leveland, OH , USA ). Objective image noise ( OIN ) was recorded and five radiologists rated the subjective image quality independently. Radiation parameters were derived from the scan protocols. Results The CTDI vol could be reduced by 50% to 5.8 mGy ( P  < 0.0001). The same reduction was achieved for DLP and effective dose to 253 ± 27 mGy*cm ( P  < 0.0001) and 3.9 ± 0.4 mSv ( P  < 0.0001). IR led to a reduction of the OIN of up to 61% compared with classic filtered back projection ( FBP ) ( P  < 0.0001). The OIN declined with increasing IR levels. RDCT with FBP showed the lowest scores of subjective image quality (2.32 ± 0.04). Mean scores improved with increasing IR levels. i D ose6 was rated with the best mean score (3.66 ± 0.04). Conclusion The evaluated IR ‐tool and protocol may be applied to achieve a considerable radiation dose reduction in MDCT for diagnostics of urolithiasis while maintaining a confident image quality. Best image quality, suitable for evaluation of the entire abdomen concerning differential diagnoses, was achieved with i D ose6.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom