Premium
‘What ought to belong to merit only ’: Debating Status and Heredity in the New American Republic
Author(s) -
Cutterham Tom
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal for eighteenth‐century studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.129
H-Index - 11
eISSN - 1754-0208
pISSN - 1754-0194
DOI - 10.1111/1754-0208.12409
Subject(s) - aristocracy (class) , legitimacy , monarchy , rhetoric , ideology , politics , power (physics) , dominance (genetics) , heredity , context (archaeology) , sociology , environmental ethics , political science , social science , political economy , law , history , philosophy , linguistics , physics , biochemistry , chemistry , genetics , archaeology , quantum mechanics , biology , gene
Despite the critique of monarchy and aristocracy that contributed to American Revolutionary rhetoric, not all revolutionaries dismissed the idea of hereditary status. During the 1780s a debate emerged over the proper nature of status and the true location of social power in the new republic, instigated by a new organisation: the Society of the Cincinnati. Subject to withering attacks in its earliest years, the Cincinnati also generated spirited defences. The controversy challenged the dominance of oppositional republican ideology and, in the context of political and economic change, helped some Americans develop a new understanding of power and legitimacy.