Open AccessCOVID‐19 in one region of New Zealand: a descriptive epidemiological study
Author(s) -
Hammond Vanessa,
Butchard Michael,
Stablein Hohepa,
Jack Susan
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.946
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1753-6405
pISSN - 1326-0200
DOI - 10.1111/1753-6405.13305
Subject(s) - epidemiology , context (archaeology) , covid-19 , incubation period , quarantine , transmission (telecommunications) , demography , descriptive statistics , medicine , geography , environmental health , incubation , outbreak , biology , virology , disease , statistics , pathology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , mathematics , biochemistry , archaeology , engineering , sociology , electrical engineering
Objective : To describe the epidemiology of COVID‐19 in one region of New Zealand in the context of the national lockdown and provide a reference for comparing infection dynamics and control measures between SARS‐Cov‐2 strains. Methods : Epidemiological linking and analysis of COVID‐19 cases and their close contacts residing in the geographical area served by the Southern District Health Board (SDHB). Results : From 13 March to 5 April 5 2020, 186 cases were laboratory‐confirmed with wild‐type Sars‐Cov‐2 in SDHB. Overall, 35·1% of cases were attributable to household transmission, 27·0% to non‐household, 25·4% to overseas travel and 12·4% had no known epidemiological links. The highest secondary attack rate was observed in households during lockdown (15·3%, 95%CI 10·4–21·5). The mean serial interval in 50 exclusive infector‐infectee pairs was 4·0 days (95%CI 3·2–4·7days), and the mean incubation period was 3.4 days (95%CI 2·7–4·2). Conclusions : The SARS‐CoV‐2 incubation period may be shorter than early estimates that were limited by uncertainties in exposure history or small sample sizes. Implications for public health : The continuation of household transmission during lockdown highlights the need for effective home‐based quarantine guidance. Our findings of a short incubation period highlight the need to contact trace and isolate as rapidly as possible.