z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Identification of a definite diabetic cardiomyopathy in type 2 diabetes by comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation: A cross‐sectional comparison with non‐diabetic weight‐matched controls
Author(s) -
Ofstad Anne Pernille,
Urheim Stig,
Dalen Håvard,
Orvik Elsa,
Birkeland Kåre I,
Gullestad Lars,
W Fagerland Morten,
Johansen Odd Erik,
Aakhus Svend
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of diabetes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.949
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1753-0407
pISSN - 1753-0393
DOI - 10.1111/1753-0407.12239
Subject(s) - medicine , diabetic cardiomyopathy , diabetes mellitus , cross sectional study , cardiomyopathy , cardiology , type 2 diabetes , endocrinology , heart failure , pathology
Background S ubclinical left ventricular ( LV ) dysfunction is prevalent in type 2 diabetes ( T 2 DM ). As obesity has been proposed as one causal factor in the disease process, this could bias the reported prevalences. We wanted to characterize echocardiographic LV dysfunction in obese T 2 DM subjects as compared to non‐diabetic obese controls. Methods O ne hundred patients with T 2 DM without clinical signs of heart failure (29% females, mean ±  SD age 58.4 ± 10.5 years, body mass index ( BMI ) 30.1 ± 5.5 kg/m 2 , blood pressure ( BP ) 141 ± 18/83 ± 9 mmHg) and 100 non‐diabetic controls (29% females) matched for age (58.6 ± 10.5 years), BMI (29.8 ± 4.0 kg/m 2 ) and systolic BP (140 ± 14 mmHg) underwent echocardiography and color tissue D oppler imaging ( TDI ). Diastolic function was evaluated with conventional D oppler recordings and early (e′) and late (a′) myocardial velocities. The ratio between early transmitral filling ( E ) and the corresponding myocardial tissue velocity (e′) served as an index of LV filling pressure. Results T 2 DM patients had more concentric hypertrophy with a relative wall thickness of 0.42 ± 0.07 vs controls 0.38 ± 0.07, P  < 0.001. The T 2 DM group had signs of diastolic dysfunction with lower E / A ratio (0.91 ± 0.27 vs. 1.12 ± 0.38, P  < 0.001), deceleration time (195 ± 49 vs 242 ± 72 ms, P  < 0.001), e′ (5.7 ± 2.0 vs. 6.6 ± 1.8 cm/s, P  = 0.001), and a′ (6.5 ± 2.0 vs. 7.6 ± 1.5 cm/s, P  < 0.001) compared to the controls, and higher E /e′ (13.3 ± 4.7 vs. 11.1 ± 3.5, P  < 0.001). Thus, there were indications of pseudo normalization and increased filling pressure in the T 2 DM group, whereas the controls had evidence for relaxation abnormalities without elevated filling pressure. Conclusion C ompared to a non‐diabetic obese group, more advanced subclinical impairment of diastolic function was seen in T 2 DM .

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom