Premium
Effects of Land Use and Sample Location on Nitrate‐Stream Flow Hysteresis Descriptors during Storm Events
Author(s) -
Feinson Lawrence S.,
Gibs Jacob,
Imbrigiotta Thomas E.,
Garrett Jessica D.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
jawra journal of the american water resources association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.957
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1752-1688
pISSN - 1093-474X
DOI - 10.1111/1752-1688.12477
Subject(s) - environmental science , hydrology (agriculture) , storm , nitrate , hysteresis , sampling (signal processing) , flow (mathematics) , agricultural land , atmospheric sciences , land use , meteorology , geology , geography , ecology , mathematics , physics , geometry , geotechnical engineering , filter (signal processing) , quantum mechanics , computer science , computer vision , biology
The U.S. Geological Survey's New Jersey and Iowa Water Science Centers deployed ultraviolet‐visible spectrophotometric sensors at water‐quality monitoring sites on the Passaic and Pompton Rivers at Two Bridges, New Jersey, on Toms River at Toms River, New Jersey, and on the North Raccoon River near Jefferson, Iowa to continuously measure in‐stream nitrate plus nitrite as nitrogen ( NO 3 + NO 2 ) concentrations in conjunction with continuous stream flow measurements. Statistical analysis of NO 3 + NO 2 vs . stream discharge during storm events found statistically significant links between land use types and sampling site with the normalized area and rotational direction of NO 3 + NO 2 ‐stream discharge (N‐Q) hysteresis patterns. Statistically significant relations were also found between the normalized area of a hysteresis pattern and several flow parameters as well as the normalized area adjusted for rotational direction and minimum NO 3 + NO 2 concentrations. The mean normalized hysteresis area for forested land use was smaller than that of urban and agricultural land uses. The hysteresis rotational direction of the agricultural land use was opposite of that of the urban and undeveloped land uses. An r 2 of 0.81 for the relation between the minimum normalized NO 3 + NO 2 concentration during a storm vs . the normalized NO 3 + NO 2 concentration at peak flow suggested that dilution was the dominant process controlling NO 3 + NO 2 concentrations over the course of most storm events.