z-logo
Premium
Assessment of different modalities for repeated tissue acquisition in diagnosing malignant biliary strictures: A two‐center retrospective study
Author(s) -
Yang Xia,
Guo Jie Fang,
Sun Li Qi,
Hu Jin Hua,
Shi Yong Jun,
Zhang Jun Yong,
Jin Zhen Dong
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of digestive diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.684
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1751-2980
pISSN - 1751-2972
DOI - 10.1111/1751-2980.12964
Subject(s) - medicine , radiology , biopsy , retrospective cohort study , pathological , endoscopic ultrasound , cytology , nuclear medicine , surgery , pathology
Objective Various modalities are applied for pathological diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures (MBS), including brush cytology (BC), forceps biopsy (FB) and endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA). We aimed to assess the value of these modalities in a repeated tissue acquisition process for biliary strictures with initially inconclusive pathological outcomes. Methods Patients who were suspected of having MBS and underwent a BC in two large teaching hospitals were retrospectively included. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of the initial and repeated BC, FB and EUS‐FNA were analyzed. Their performances were compared to determine which modality was superior in repeated tissue acquisition. Results In total, 476 patients were included. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in diagnosing MBS for the initial BC were 30.3%, 100% and 55.0%, respectively. Altogether 39, 27 and 44 patients underwent a repeat BC, FB and EUS‐FNA, respectively. The sensitivity for repeated BC, FB and EUS‐FNA was 41.2%, 61.1% and 44.4%, respectively, whereas their specificity all reached 100%. When comparing diagnostic accuracy, none of the modalities was superior (74.4% vs 74.1% vs 54.5%, P = 0.173). In the repeated process, one patient who underwent BC and two underwent FB developed mild pancreatitis. Conclusions Repeated tissue acquisition achieves a conclusive diagnosis of MBS in nearly half patients who have an initially inconclusive cytological diagnosis. None of the tissue acquisition methods is significantly superior in the repeated process.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here