Premium
The effect of position on esophageal structure and function determined with solid‐state high‐resolution manometry
Author(s) -
Zhang Xiu Jing,
Xiang Xue Lian,
Tu Lei,
Xie Xiao Ping,
Hou Xiao Hua
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of digestive diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.684
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1751-2980
pISSN - 1751-2972
DOI - 10.1111/1751-2980.12256
Subject(s) - supine position , esophageal sphincter , medicine , high resolution manometry , sitting , reflux , nuclear medicine , anatomy , esophagus , anesthesia , achalasia , disease , pathology
Objective To investigate the influence of posture on the anatomy and function of esophageal sphincters using solid‐state high‐resolution manometry. Methods Fifty individuals underwent esophageal manometry with a 36‐channel solid‐state catheter in the supine and upright positions. The length and pressure of the esophageal sphincters, as well as the esophageal and intra‐abdominal lengths of lower esophageal sphincter ( LES ), were recorded. The residual pressure of the upper esophageal sphincter ( UES ) and the 4‐s integrated relaxation pressure were also measured when the participants swallowed 10 consecutive servings of water (5 mL each). The Bland–Altman plot was used to assess agreement between these parameters in the supine and upright positions. Results The LES resting pressure was significantly decreased in the upright position compared with the supine position (13.85 ± 5.90 mm H g vs 18.09 ± 7.80 mm H g, P = 0.000). Weaker integrated relaxation pressures were observed when the participants were in the upright position (5.66 ± 3.33 mm H g vs 7.80 ± 3.25 mm H g, P = 0.000). Compared with the supine position, the upright esophageal length was longer ( P = 0.004) and the upper border of the LES was lower ( P = 0.050) when the individuals were in the upright position. The agreement between the two positions was acceptable for the esophageal length, LES upper border location and LES pressure measurements. Conclusions Body position exerts a greater influence on the LES than on the UES . Thus, it is necessary to establish normal values for the LES basal pressure and residual pressure in different positions.