z-logo
Premium
Foaming Properties of Whey Protein Isolate and λ‐Carrageenan Mixed Systems
Author(s) -
Wang Zhengshan,
Zhang Sha,
Vardhanabhuti Bongkosh
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of food science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1750-3841
pISSN - 0022-1147
DOI - 10.1111/1750-3841.12940
Subject(s) - whey protein isolate , carrageenan , rheology , whey protein , chemistry , bubble , viscosity , chemical engineering , apparent viscosity , polysaccharide , chromatography , microstructure , food science , materials science , organic chemistry , crystallography , composite material , parallel computing , computer science , engineering
Heating protein with polysaccharide under neutral or near neutral pH can induce the formation of soluble complex with improved functional properties. The objective of our research was to investigate the effects of λ‐carrageenan (λC) concentrations and pH on foaming properties of heated whey protein isolate (WPI) and λC soluble complex (h‐cpx) in comparison to heated WPI with added λC (pWPI‐λC), and unheated WPI with λC (WPI‐λC). In all 3 WPI‐λC systems at pH 7, increasing λC concentration led to improved foamability until a certain concentration before it decreased. Despite their higher viscosity, both heated systems (pWPI‐λC and h‐cpx) showed significantly better foamability and foam stability compared to WPI‐λC. Rheological results of foams with 0.25% λC suggested that higher elasticity and viscous films were produced in h‐cpx and pWPI‐λC systems corresponding to better foam stability. Foam microstructure images indicated that foams produced from h‐cpx had thicker film and consisted of smaller initial bubble area and more uniform bubble size. Results from the effect of pH (6.2, 6.5, and 7.0) further confirmed that stronger interactions between WPI and λC during heating contributed to the improved foaming properties. Foam stability was higher in h‐cpx system at all 3 pH levels, especially under pH 6.2 where there were strongest interactions between the biopolymers.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here