z-logo
Premium
Genetic relationships between O eneis urda and O . mongolica ( N ymphalidae: L epidoptera)
Author(s) -
Kim SungSoo,
Wan Xinlong,
Kim Min Jee,
Kim Iksoo
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
entomological research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.421
H-Index - 20
eISSN - 1748-5967
pISSN - 1738-2297
DOI - 10.1111/1748-5967.12013
Subject(s) - biology , phylogenetic tree , gene , population , genetic distance , genetics , internal transcribed spacer , mitochondrial dna , genetic divergence , evolutionary biology , genetic variation , genetic diversity , demography , sociology
Abstract The species status of O eneis urda ( E versmann) and O . mongolica ( O berthür) has been argued based on morphological characters. Reexamination of their major morphological characters has shown a slight differentiation in the two species. Sequences of three mitochondrial genes ( COI , ND 6, and ND 1) and one nuclear region (internal transcribed spacer 2, ITS 2) from two O . urda populations ( Y angyang and M t. H anla) and one O . mongolica population ( U ljin) were performed for phylogenetic and population genetic inferences. Sharing of identical sequences in the ND 6 gene and ITS 2, minimal sequence divergence in the COI and ND 1 genes, and phylogenetically undividable sequence types in all mitochondrial genes and ITS 2 suggest genetic continuity between the two species. Nevertheless, significant F ST estimates ( P < 0.05) were found for the COI gene in comparisons between Y angyang ( O . urda ) and U ljin ( O . mongolica ), between Y angyang ( O . urda ) and M t. H anla ( O . urda ), and between U ljin ( O . mongolica ) and M t. H anla ( O . urda ) populations. These F ST estimates, along with other gene‐based analyses collectively suggest isolation of the two species at some point in the past, but incomplete separation between the two species on the mainland ( Y angyang and U ljin) and biogeographically forced isolation of the O . urda population on M t. H anla collectively appear to complicate species status of these two species that were once further clearly separated.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here