Premium
Development of a diabetes‐related nutrition knowledge questionnaire for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Singapore
Author(s) -
Han Chad Y.,
Zheng Xiaomei,
Lee Lin F.,
Chan Cherie G.B.,
Lee Yi Q.,
Zailani Nani A.,
Ng Karin,
Bhaskaran Kalpana
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
nutrition and dietetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.479
H-Index - 31
eISSN - 1747-0080
pISSN - 1446-6368
DOI - 10.1111/1747-0080.12513
Subject(s) - cronbach's alpha , construct validity , reliability (semiconductor) , intraclass correlation , medicine , test (biology) , internal consistency , diabetes mellitus , content validity , type 2 diabetes mellitus , construct (python library) , clinical psychology , psychology , family medicine , psychometrics , computer science , paleontology , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , programming language , biology , endocrinology
Aim Diabetes‐related nutrition knowledge (DRNK) is essential for the self‐care of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A specific tool measuring DRNK can help us to understand awareness levels and tailor structured nutrition education programs. Our study aimed to develop a questionnaire to assess DRNK for individuals with T2DM in Singapore. Methods An expert panel was formed to consolidate in‐depth, culturally suitable, and current information on DRNK. A literature review of diabetes self‐care knowledge questionnaires was performed to outline the scope of the questionnaire and generate a question pool. User friendliness was tested in the first draft of the questionnaire (n = 21). Then, a second draft was tested for item difficulty, discrimination index, and internal consistency (n = 62). The final draft was examined for construct validity and test–retest reliability (n = 100). Results The final questionnaire (four sections: 27 questions) was found to be consistent and reliable. The item difficulty scores of the selected questions ranged from difficult to desirable (2–85). There was fair to good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.66, 0.79, 0.56, and 0.78 for Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively) and construct validity (independent t ‐test: P < 0.001). Questions in the final questionnaire had an average discrimination index of 0.3 (reasonably good). The questionnaire was revealed to have good test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation: 0.82–0.84). Conclusions The DRNK questionnaire is a valid and reliable measure to complement assessment tools measuring self‐efficacy/behaviour in individuals with T2DM living in Singapore.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom