Premium
Comparison of malnutrition inflammation score, anthropometry and biochemical parameters in assessing the difference in protein‐energy wasting between normal weight and obese patients undergoing haemodialysis
Author(s) -
Alipoor Elham,
HosseinzadehAttar Mohammad Javad,
MahdaviMazdeh Mitra,
Yaseri Mehdi,
Zahed Narges S.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
nutrition and dietetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.479
H-Index - 31
eISSN - 1747-0080
pISSN - 1446-6368
DOI - 10.1111/1747-0080.12343
Subject(s) - wasting , medicine , anthropometry , malnutrition , appetite , anorexia , weight loss , obesity , body mass index , gastroenterology , wasting syndrome , cachexia , endocrinology , cancer
Aim Protein‐energy wasting ( PEW ) is prevalent in haemodialysis. Obesity is an independent risk factor of kidney insufficiency, but it is proposed to have beneficial roles in better outcomes in the final stage of disease. Better nutritional status and body reserves are among probable mechanisms, but direct examinations are limited. The present study aimed to investigate whether obese patients have preferable nutritional status compared to normal weight patients based on malnutrition inflammation score ( MIS ) and other PEW parameters in haemodialysis. Methods This case–control study investigated 52 normal weight (18.5 < body mass index ( BMI ) < 25 kg/m 2 ) and 48 obese ( BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 ) patients on regular haemodialysis. PEW was assessed based on anthropometric and biochemical factors, recent weight changes, appetite, anorexia, dietary intake and MIS . Results Obese patients had better MIS compared with the normal weight group ( P < 0.001), although varying degrees of wasting were prevalent among this group too (75% mild and 25% moderate wasting). The obese group had less significant weight loss (4.2 vs 8%) and anorexia and better appetite. However, a considerable percentage of patients in both groups showed muscle (94.6% of normal weight and 19.5% of obese) and peripheral fat tissue (89.2% of normal weight and 31.7% of obese) losses compared to the 50th percentile. Biochemical parameters were not significantly different between groups except for triglyceride ( P = 0.001), transferrin and total iron‐binding capacity ( P = 0.028). Conclusions MIS was significantly better in obese patients; however, both groups showed degrees of wasting based on MIS and other PEW parameters. Nutritional status of obese haemodialysis patients should be monitored regularly because of high risk of PEW like other BMI categories.